<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Validate and Verify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://validateverify.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://validateverify.com</link>
	<description>There is always one more bug</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>&#8216;Code Coverage&#8217; - How does it help in testing ?</title>
		<link>http://validateverify.com/2008/07/code-coverage-how-does-it-help-in-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://validateverify.com/2008/07/code-coverage-how-does-it-help-in-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nandanjha</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Testing Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://validateverify.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The million dollar question which every Manager asks to testing teams is that &#8216;Whether they have executed all the test cases ? &#8220;. If you are a software test practitioner, you would be feeling really frustrated. How on earth, can you ever execute all the &#8216;Test Cases&#8217; for a particular feature.
Well, there is no silver [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://validateverify.com/2008/07/code-coverage-how-does-it-help-in-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Software Testing Interview Questions</title>
		<link>http://validateverify.com/2008/07/top-10-software-testing-interview-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://validateverify.com/2008/07/top-10-software-testing-interview-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nandanjha</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://validateverify.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been thinking for a long time to write something on interviews. I usually take an interview every week, if not more and most of the times the candidate loses out. More so because the interview process in my company is really comprehensive, 5+ interviews, and being a small company, in terms of number [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://validateverify.com/2008/07/top-10-software-testing-interview-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dual personality - Being a tester and an end user</title>
		<link>http://validateverify.com/2008/05/dual-personality-being-a-tester-and-an-end-user/</link>
		<comments>http://validateverify.com/2008/05/dual-personality-being-a-tester-and-an-end-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nandanjha</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Testing Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://validateverify.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Software testers, one of the big responsibility we all share is being acting like a user. While most of us love it and use this for our and user&#8217;s advantage its not a very natural thing to do. If it had been, then probably you would be that user and not really a software [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://validateverify.com/2008/05/dual-personality-being-a-tester-and-an-end-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distinguishing QA and QC</title>
		<link>http://validateverify.com/2008/02/distinguishing-qa-and-qc/</link>
		<comments>http://validateverify.com/2008/02/distinguishing-qa-and-qc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nandanjha</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Testing Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://validateverify.com/2008/02/17/distinguishing-qa-and-qc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is mostly a result of a comment from Rahul. He made the comment on a post on Validation and Verification and I think it was a great idea, so here I am with an attempt to distinguish these two closely related and often wrongly used acronyms viz QA (Quality Assurance) and QC (Quality [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://validateverify.com/2008/02/distinguishing-qa-and-qc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Things towards a Happy Test Lab</title>
		<link>http://validateverify.com/2008/02/five-things-towards-a-happy-test-lab/</link>
		<comments>http://validateverify.com/2008/02/five-things-towards-a-happy-test-lab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nandanjha</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Testing Concepts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://validateverify.com/2008/02/12/five-things-towards-a-happy-test-lab/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Large software organizations have the luxury to invest in labs, or test labs to help their test engineer better test a software. These labs could range from a setup having racks and racks of machines of various configs or could be just a big room with 10-20 machines. Having worked in a company (Legato Systems, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://validateverify.com/2008/02/five-things-towards-a-happy-test-lab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
